Case 3202694/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Ogunkoya v Nightingale Residential Care Home Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202694/2019
- Decision date
- 25 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Brien
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms K Ogunkoya
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs K Ogunkoya brought claims for wrongful dismissal, arrears of pay or unauthorised deductions, unpaid holiday pay, and breach of contract against Nightingale Residential Care Home Limited and Mr A Oduleyu. Employment Judge O'Brien, sitting alone, found that by 4 April 2019 the parties had expressly agreed that she would provide care home consultancy services as an independent self-employed contractor from 1 April 2019, and that Mr Oduleyu contracted in his capacity as director and owner of the first respondent rather than personally.
The tribunal rejected the claimant's case that her status changed from 1 July 2019 when the registered manager left. It found that her interim management of the home, the increase in monthly payments, the correspondence about tax, and the absence of any agreed change in legal status were consistent with self-employment. Applying the s230 ERA 1996 definitions and the Ready Mixed Concrete and Autoclenz approach, the tribunal held that she was neither an employee nor a worker.
As a result, the wrongful dismissal claim and the claimant's breach of contract claim were dismissed, as were the claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and accrued but untaken holiday pay. The second respondent's contractual counterclaim also failed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The ET1 pleaded wrongful dismissal and notice pay, but the tribunal dismissed the claim because Ms Ogunkoya was not an employee. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's separate breach of contract claim, pleaded as a failure to repay authorised expenses, was dismissed for the same reason. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages failed because the claimant was found not to be a worker. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay failed because the claimant was found not to be a worker. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The second respondent's contractual counterclaim failed because the claimant was found not to be an employee. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s230 ERA 1996
- Ready Mixed Concrete
- Cotswold Development Construction Ltd v Williams
- Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.