Case 3202699/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Richard Watkins Mr Stephen Green Mrs Susan Read Mr Oliver Graystone v CCE Group Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202699/2020
- Decision date
- 14 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodrich Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Richard Watkins Mr Stephen Green Mrs Susan Read Mr Oliver Graystone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment in four joined case numbers: 3202699/2020, 3212755/2020, 3212756/2020 and 3213059/2020. The hearing took place at East London Hearing Centre on 14 May 2021 before Employment Judge Goodrich. The claimants did not attend and were not represented; the respondent also did not attend and was not represented.
The judgment records that none of the claimants participated in the hearing or contacted the Tribunal to request a postponement. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out their claims. No substantive findings on the merits of any underlying claim are recorded in the judgment text.
No remedy, award, or liability analysis is recorded. The judgment is limited to the procedural strike-out outcome and does not identify the underlying causes of action beyond the joined case numbers and the fact that the claims were struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type(s). It states that none of the claimants participated in the hearing or contacted the Tribunal to request a postponement, and their claims were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.