Case 3202787/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Bella Barbara v Citadel Apartments Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202787/2019
- Decision date
- 22 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Bella Barbara
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response having been provided by the respondent, the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The claim was for outstanding wages brought pursuant to section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal ordered Citadel Apartments Limited to pay Miss Bella Barbara £164.00 net of any deduction for tax and National Insurance. No separate award breakdown beyond that sum was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure after no response was provided. The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for outstanding wages under section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £164.00 net of tax and National Insurance deductions. | Upheld | — | £164 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £164
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.