Case 3202792/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Sharma v The Co-Operative Group Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202792/2019
- Decision date
- 5 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Sharma
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed on capability grounds with effect from 16 January 2019. He pursued the respondent's internal appeal process, including a first appeal rejected on 4 March 2019 and a second appeal process which led to further occupational health advice before the dismissal was confirmed on 9 September 2019. He contacted ACAS on 11 November 2019 and presented his tribunal claim on 26 November 2019.
The tribunal found that the claimant knew, or should have known with trade union advice, about the right to bring an employment tribunal claim, the three-month time limit, and that an internal appeal did not make it not reasonably practicable to present a claim in time. It took account of delay in the appeal process attributable to the respondent, and of the claimant's health, family and financial circumstances, but found these did not make timely presentation not reasonably practicable.
The tribunal also found that, even if it had not been reasonably practicable to present the claim in time, the claimant did not present it within a reasonable further period. In particular, after the final appeal outcome on 9 September 2019, he waited two months before contacting ACAS and a further two weeks after the certificate was issued before presenting the claim. The claim was therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because it was presented outside the primary time limit, it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, and the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable test
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend on Sea Borough Council
- Dedman v British Building & Engineering Appliances Limited
- North East London NHS Foundation Trust v Zhou
- John Lewis plc v Charman
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.