Case 3202882/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Neal v Veolia ES (UK) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3202882/2022
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Neal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the Respondent's name to Veolia ES (UK) Limited. The Claimant withdrew his claim for unfair dismissal, and the tribunal dismissed that claim following withdrawal pursuant to Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the Claimant's rate of pay was unconditionally increased to £18.25 from 1 October 2021. It also found that the Claimant had been paid all sums he claimed had fallen due up to the cessation of his employment on 31 March 2022. The claim for unauthorised deduction of wages therefore failed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Described in the judgment as a claim for unauthorised deduction of wages which failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.