Case 3202888/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Kutner v Victor Michael Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3202888/2022
- Decision date
- 6 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Kutner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 1 September 2023, the Tribunal gave Miss J Kutner an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were unreasonable conduct, non-compliance with the Tribunal's orders of 3 October 2022 and 8 August 2023, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Ross ordered that the claim be struck out.
The consequence recorded in the judgment was that the hearing fixed for 16-19, 23 and 24 January 2024 would not take place. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claims or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 1 September 2023. The reasons given were unreasonable conduct, failure to comply with the Tribunal's orders dated 3 October 2022 and 8 August 2023, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.