Case 3202906/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Manning v Ramen Chill Westcliffe Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3202906/2022
- Decision date
- 26 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Townley Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Manning
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr L Manning was employed by Ramen Chill Westcliffe Ltd as a Sous Chef from October 2020 on an agreed gross salary of £28,000 a year, without a written contract. He resigned without notice on 5 March 2022. The respondent did not appear and was not represented. The tribunal found that salary for January, February, and 1-5 March 2022 had not been paid, that 18 days' holiday during the leave year starting October 2021 remained unpaid, that £700 of pension contributions had not been paid over 14 months, and that the claimant had not been given written itemised pay statements.
The tribunal ordered payment of £1,512.00 for January salary, £1,812.00 for February salary, and £453.00 for 1-5 March 2022, plus £1,072.00 for unpaid holiday, £700.00 for unpaid pension contributions, and £1,087.22 for the failure to provide itemised pay statements. The judgment states a total of £6,636.26 and notes that the pay-statement sum is treated on a gross basis for tax purposes, with the claimant to account to HMRC separately for income tax and National Insurance on that element.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records unpaid salary for January 2022 (£1,512.00, described as '£1,812.000-£30.00'), February 2022 (£1,812.00), and 1-5 March 2022 (£453.00). The January figure is taken as printed in the judgment text. | Upheld | — | £3,777 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday for 18 days in the leave year commencing October 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,072 |
| Other | Unpaid pension contributions of £700.00 over 14 months between October 2020 and 5 March 2022. | Upheld | — | £700 |
| Other | Failure to provide written itemised pay statements. The judgment states a total of £6,636.26, although the printed line items sum to £6,636.22. | Upheld | — | £1,087 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,636
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.