Case 3202952/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Wilkins v Code Investing Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202952/2019
- Decision date
- 27 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grewal Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Wilkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe employment tribunal at London Central, before Employment Judge Grewal on 27 November 2020, recorded that neither party appeared. The judgment ordered Code Investing Ltd (in liquidation) to pay Mr P Wilkins £26,999.90 gross for deductions made from his pay in contravention of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The written judgment says that the sum included holiday pay. No further reasons, findings, or split of the award are given in the extracted text, so the award is recorded as a single unlawful deduction from wages claim with the full amount treated as the tribunal's bottom-line figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent was to pay the claimant £26,999.90 gross for deductions from pay in contravention of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and that this included holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £27,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £27,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.