Case 3202963/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Edirisinghe v Mrs A Sura t/a Pathway Independent Care and Autism Services — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202963/2019
- Decision date
- 4 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
- Panel members
- Ms S Harwood, Mr Duncan Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Edirisinghe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs M Edirisinghe was unfairly dismissed on 22 October 2019. In the remedy schedule it recorded that she was 33 years old at the effective date of termination and had eight full years of continuous service. Her gross pay for statutory purposes was agreed at £189.75 per week, producing a basic award of £1,518.00.
For the compensatory award, the tribunal accepted that loss should be calculated only up to 4 March 2020 because of a failure to mitigate loss. It accepted the parties' agreed figures for the pay she would have received if shifts had been offered, the net monthly pay, her alternative earnings of £841.35, and pension contributions at 3%. It also awarded £650.00 for loss of statutory rights and £12.00 for travel costs in seeking employment, but declined any further award for newspaper costs because there was no evidence. The total compensatory award before uplift was £4,848.74.
The tribunal found there had been a substantial failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice, Discipline and Grievances at Work, which it held applied on the facts, and it ordered a 25% uplift on the compensatory award. That produced a compensatory award of £6,060.92 and a total award of £7,578.92. It also declared that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 did not apply because the claimant said she had not claimed state benefits during the loss period.
The claimant’s direct discrimination claims, pleaded as sex discrimination and pregnancy discrimination arising from her having taken maternity leave, were dismissed. The tribunal also made no separate award for notice pay or wrongful dismissal because no such claim had been included in the amended ET1, and in any event the unfair dismissal compensation covered the same period of loss. The claimant’s application for costs was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim upheld. The tribunal ordered a basic award of £1,518.00 and a compensatory award of £6,060.92, making a total of £7,578.92. The compensatory award included a 25% uplift for a substantial failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice, Discipline and Grievances at Work. | Upheld | — | £7,579 |
| Sex discrimination | Direct discrimination because of sex was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Direct discrimination because of pregnancy, including having availed herself of maternity leave, was dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,579
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,518
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £6,061
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ACAS Code of Practice, Discipline and Grievances at Work
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.