Case 3202976/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alan Stuart v Andrews Excavations Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202976/2019
- Decision date
- 9 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alan Stuart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Alan Stuart, succeeded in his claim for unlawful deduction from wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal noted that the respondent did not attend the hearing, had failed to comply with case management orders, and had not disclosed any contract entitling it to deduct monies from the claimant's wages. It also relied on the claimant's ET1, his evidence, and the respondent's ET3, which admitted that sums had been deducted.
The tribunal found that £980 was due for work done during the period 15 to 23 October 2019, calculated as 7 working days at £140 per day. It also upheld the claim for payment in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave under Regulations 14 and 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, finding that the claimant started work on 8 July 2019, left on 23 October 2019, took no annual leave, and was entitled to 8.2 days at £140 per day, totalling £1,148.
The respondent's counterclaim in relation to alleged damage to a vehicle was dismissed. The tribunal said the respondent had not disclosed any contract allowing it to recover sums incurred as a consequence of damage to a vehicle, had not proved that the claimant was responsible for any vehicle damage, and had not established by evidence that it had incurred costs or expenditure in respect of any such damage. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,128 in total.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent unlawfully deducted sums from the claimant's wages. It awarded £980 for 7 working days at £140 per day during the period 15 to 23 October 2019. | Upheld | — | £980 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal upheld the claim for payment in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave under Regulations 14 and 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It found the claimant started work on 8 July 2019, left on 23 October 2019, took no annual leave, and was entitled to 8.2 days at £140 per day. | Upheld | — | £1,148 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's counterclaim relating to alleged damage to a vehicle was dismissed because it failed to disclose any contract entitling it to recover the sums, failed to prove the claimant was responsible for the damage, and failed to prove any associated costs or expenditure. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,128
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.