Case 3202982/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Slaughter v A & G Recycling Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3202982/2019
- Decision date
- 29 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Slaughter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Russell Date determined the claim without a respondent response. The tribunal found that A & G Recycling Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr M Slaughter's wages and ordered it to pay £5,005.25.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,336.19. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to provide written statement of employment particulars and made an award of £665.56, described as two weeks' pay, pursuant to s.38 of the Employment Act 2002. The total monetary award was £8,007.00.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £5,005.25. | Upheld | — | £5,005 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,336.19. | Upheld | — | £2,336 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide the claimant with written statement of employment particulars and ordered £665.56, described as two weeks' pay, under s.38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £666 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,007
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.