Case 3202998/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Carson v Lead Digital Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202998/2019
- Decision date
- 8 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 default judgment after the respondent failed to enter a response to Ms V Carson's claims. Judgment was therefore entered in her favour on her unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, unlawful victimisation, and unpaid holiday pay complaints.
The judgment records that the claims succeeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No liability reasoning beyond the default judgment was set out in the extracted text.
The tribunal stated that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled would be determined at a remedy hearing. No monetary award was recorded in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as an unpaid holiday pay claim; no further statutory label is given in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.