Case 3203006/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Thompson v All Care Plus Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3203006/2019
- Decision date
- 13 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Speker OBE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented claims alleging unfair dismissal and holiday pay. The unfair dismissal claim had already been struck out on 4 May 2020 after warnings, on the basis that it had no real prospect of success. The reasons record that the claimant had only one month of qualifying service.
At the hearing on 13 May 2020, the claimant did not participate. On the holiday pay issue, no details were supplied by the claimant. The respondent's representative said the respondent had paid holiday pay, that the claimant had acknowledged receipt, and that he had indicated he accepted the payment and had no further claim.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant had not informed the tribunal otherwise. It therefore struck out the holiday pay claim and stated that the proceedings were ended. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out on 4 May 2020 following warnings as having no real prospect of success; the reasons record that the claimant had only one month of qualifying service. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The reasons state that the respondent had paid holiday pay and that the claimant had acknowledged receipt and indicated he had no further claim; the opening line says the holiday pay claim is dismissed, but the reasons conclude it was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.