Case 3203040/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Anais Barcelo v Syed Javed — 2020
- Case reference
- 3203040/2019
- Decision date
- 27 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Anais Barcelo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal record for case 3203040/2019 states that, on 27 April 2020, Employment Judge John Crosfill entered judgment after a separate judgment was made for the Claimant in case 3203041/2019. For case 3203040/2019, the Claimant's claims were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant.
The extracted text does not set out any substantive findings on the merits, identify the individual heads of claim, or record any financial award. It therefore records only the procedural dismissal following withdrawal and no remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment text does not separately itemise the heads of claim; it records that the claims in case 3203040/2019 were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The case was listed under unlawful deduction from wages and working time. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment text does not separately itemise the heads of claim; it records that the claims in case 3203040/2019 were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. The case was listed under unlawful deduction from wages and working time. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.