Case 3203041/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Anais Barcelo v Syed Naveed Shah — 2020
- Case reference
- 3203041/2019
- Decision date
- 27 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Anais Barcelo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to file an ET3 within the time limit, so the tribunal proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and considered the claimant's ET1 and the information provided at the preliminary hearing by telephone on 23 April 2020. Employment Judge John Crosfill entered judgment on 27 April 2020.
The tribunal found the claimant's arrears of pay claim well founded and ordered payment of £2,110.24 in wages, calculated as 242 hours at the prevailing National Minimum Wage / National Living Wage rate of £8.72. It also found the travel expenses claim well founded and ordered £175.50 in travel expenses.
The tribunal further found the claim for accrued but untaken annual leave under regulations 14 and 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 well founded. It recorded that the claimant worked from 13 August 2019 to 17 September 2019 inclusive, giving 36 days' employment, and held that she was entitled to 2.8 days' holiday; using an average daily rate of £81.16, the award for leave was £227.25. The total ordered to be paid was £2,512.99, and the judgment states that the recoupment regulations do not apply to the awards.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of pay brought under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 or, alternatively, under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994; awarded as 242 hours at £8.72 per hour. | Upheld | — | £2,110 |
| Breach of contract | Judgment describes this as a claim for travel expenses brought under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994. | Upheld | — | £176 |
| Working time regulations | Claim for accrued but untaken annual leave under regulations 14 and 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998; calculated as 2.8 days at an average daily rate of £81.16. | Upheld | — | £227 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,513
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.