Case 3203064/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Loomes v Little Company of Mary — 2020
- Case reference
- 3203064/2019
- Decision date
- 6 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre via CVP
- Panel members
- Miss S Harwood, Mr D Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Loomes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the liability hearing on 16 and 17 July 2020, Employment Judge John Crosfill with members Miss S Harwood and Mr D Ross found that Miss S Loomes’s claims of unfair dismissal under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were well founded. The tribunal also found her claims for unlawful deduction of wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 well founded.
In relation to the Equality Act 2010 claims, the tribunal dismissed the claims brought under sections 13 and 39. It then found that the claim under sections 15 and 39 succeeded, and that the claims under sections 20, 21 and 39 also succeeded. The judgment records disability discrimination claims, but does not set out the factual reasons in the extracted text provided.
The tribunal did not determine remedy in this liability judgment. It recorded that the appropriate remedy for the successful claims would be determined at a further hearing.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim succeeded under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claims brought under sections 13 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim under sections 15 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claims under sections 20, 21 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010 succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.