Case 3203102/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Carlos Campos Lessa v Outsprint Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3203102/2022
- Decision date
- 13 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hallen
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Carlos Campos Lessa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hallen, sitting alone by telephone on 9 September 2022, entered judgment for Mr Carlos Campos Lessa against Outsprint Limited. The tribunal awarded compensation for unpaid wages of £10,280.56 covering the period November 2021 to February 2022, and for unlawful deductions from wages of £1,780.76.
The judgment records a total award of £12,061.32. No separate discrimination, dismissal, or other claims are identified in the extracted text, and no additional remedy elements such as interest or injury to feelings are recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded compensation for unpaid wages of £10,280.56 for November 2021 to February 2022 and unlawful deductions from wages of £1,780.76, making a total award of £12,061.32. | Upheld | — | £12,061 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,061
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.