Case 3203114/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Voicu v Churchill Services — 2022
- Case reference
- 3203114/2019
- Decision date
- 25 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Voicu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal in Mrs M Voicu v Churchill Services, case number 3203114/2019, struck out the claim. The reasons record that on 17 March 2021 the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out.
The stated grounds were failure to comply with Employment Tribunal orders sent in case management on 12 May 2020 and 17 March 2021, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment were made.
The judgment is dated 25 August 2022 and is signed by Employment Judge Burgher Date. The extracted judgment does not identify any lay members, and it does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim. The reasons state that by letter dated 17 March 2021 the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with Employment Tribunal orders sent in case management on 12 May 2020 and 17 March 2021, and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.