Case 3203154/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H. Catley v Abacus Accountancy Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3203154/2019
- Decision date
- 23 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H. Catley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent confirmed Abacus Accountancy Group Limited as the employer for the purposes of the proceedings, and the respondent name was amended by consent. No substantive liability findings were made in this judgment.
The only ruling recorded was on limitation. The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages, identified as holiday pay and expenses, was presented in time by reference to the date on which payment ought to have been made, 31 July 2019. The matter was not finally decided on the merits.
The case was listed for a one-hour final hearing in due course. No award or remedy figure was set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Procedural ruling only. The tribunal held that the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages (holiday pay and expenses) was presented in time by reference to 31 July 2019, and directed that the case be listed for a one-hour final hearing. No merits determination or monetary award was recorded. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.