Case 3203161/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Kolaveri v Mr J McLanachan — 2022
- Case reference
- 3203161/2022
- Decision date
- 9 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Kolaveri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting by telephone at East London Hearing Centre before Employment Judge Park, heard Miss A Kolaveri's claim against Mr J McLanachan. The respondent did not attend. The only judgment recorded was that the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages was well-founded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,715.00. The judgment states that this was calculated on a gross basis and that the respondent was entitled to make any deductions due for tax and national insurance contributions before payment was made to the claimant.
In addition, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £594.00 in respect of financial loss attributable to the unlawful deduction from wages, pursuant to section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment does not record any other claims, liability findings, or separate heads of award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages well-founded. It ordered payment of a gross sum of £1,715.00, calculated on a gross basis and subject to any deductions for tax and national insurance, and a further £594.00 for financial loss attributable to the unlawful deduction under section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £2,309 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,309
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 24(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.