Case 3203221/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Tursucu v Sophie Petherick and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3203221/2022
- Decision date
- 21 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss P Tursucu
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a Preliminary Hearing on 7 August 2023, the Tribunal made a Case Management Order requiring Miss P Tursucu to write to the Tribunal by 28 August 2023 to confirm whether she was pursuing her claims. The order warned that, if she did not respond, an Employment Judge would consider striking out the claim for lack of active pursuit.
Miss P Tursucu did not make any written representations within the timescale, or at all, and did not respond to emails or telephone calls from the respondents' solicitor seeking clarification. The Tribunal applied Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 and concluded, in light of that silence, that the claim was not being actively pursued. The claim was therefore struck out, and the hearing listed for 26 September 2023 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause or causes of action; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.