Case 3203222/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Hastings v Charles G. Hibbs & Co. — 2022
- Case reference
- 3203222/2022
- Decision date
- 9 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Hastings
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing a Rule 21(2) order and a full-merits hearing on 9 September 2022, Employment Judge Byrne determined that Mrs J Hastings’s claims for redundancy payment, breach of contract (notice pay), and holiday pay were all well-founded. The respondent did not attend and was not represented at the hearing, which was held by telephone at East London Hearing Centre.
The tribunal awarded £15,600 for redundancy payment, £6,240 for notice pay, and £1,352 for holiday pay. The judgment records a grand total award of £23,192 payable by the respondent to the claimant forthwith.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the redundancy payment claim well-founded and awarded 20 x £780, calculated in the judgment as £520 per week x 1.5, totalling £15,600. | Upheld | — | £15,600 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the notice pay claim well-founded and awarded 12 x £520, totalling £6,240. | Upheld | — | £6,240 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay claim well-founded and awarded 13 x £104, totalling £1,352. | Upheld | — | £1,352 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £23,192
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.