Case 3203236/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I F Kamara v BS Project Services Limited t/a BS Social Care — 2023
- Case reference
- 3203236/2021
- Decision date
- 31 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I F Kamara
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the reconsideration hearing on 22 March 2023, Employment Judge C Lewis considered whether to revisit the earlier decision striking out Mr I F Kamara’s breach of contract claim against BS Project Services Limited t/a BS Social Care. The Claimant, who had worked for the Respondent from 22 November 2019 until he resigned on 18 March 2021, said the Respondent had breached contractual health and safety duties by sending him to an unsafe placement and failing to disclose risks before an incident on 26 September 2020 involving a service user. At the earlier preliminary hearing on 17 November 2021, he had confirmed that he did not resign in response to the alleged breach and had disavowed any constructive dismissal claim.
The tribunal accepted that the Claimant was seeking damages for trauma, injury to his physical and mental health, and consequential loss from being unable to work some other assignments. It held that those were damages, or a sum due, in respect of personal injury within articles 3 and 4 of the Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1996, so the Employment Tribunal lacked jurisdiction over the breach of contract claim. The decision to strike out that claim was therefore confirmed, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Reconsideration on 22 March 2023 confirmed the earlier strike-out for lack of jurisdiction. The tribunal held that the damages sought were for trauma, injury to physical and mental health, and consequential loss, which fell within the personal-injury exclusion in the Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1996, articles 3 and 4
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.