Case 3203255/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Claimant v Investigo Ltd and Department For Education — 2022

Case reference: 3203255/2022
Decision date: 4 October 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Reid Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

Investigo Ltd and Department For Education

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a letter dated 30 June 2022, the Tribunal ordered the claimant to confirm by 8 July 2022 the basis on which he pursued his unfair dismissal claim, because he had less than two years' service. The Tribunal also advised him that he did not have the required two years' service for a redundancy payment claim.

No response was received to that order. The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal claim for non-compliance with the order and struck out the redundancy payment claim because, in any event, the claimant could not bring such a claim with less than two years' service. The remaining claims were left listed for hearing on 6 December 2022, converted to a preliminary hearing (open).

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Struck out because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 30/06/2022 to explain the basis of the unfair dismissal claim, given that he had less than two years' service.	Struck out	—	—
Redundancy	Struck out because the claimant did not have the required two years' service for a redundancy payment claim.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.