Case 3203753/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Akhtar v Morrison Water Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3203753/2022
- Decision date
- 11 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reid
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Akhtar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr N Akhtar's claim against Morrison Water Services Ltd. It found that he had ignored recent correspondence from the respondent and had failed to respond to the tribunal's strike-out warning letter dated 6 December 2022, which required a response by 19 December 2022. The tribunal recorded that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The judgment states that the hearing fixed for 24, 25 and 26 April 2024 would not take place. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The extracted judgment text says only that 'the claim' was struck out. This claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing for the case and is not separately analysed in the judgment text. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The extracted judgment text says only that 'the claim' was struck out. This claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing for the case and is not separately analysed in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The extracted judgment text says only that 'the claim' was struck out. This claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing for the case and is not separately analysed in the judgment text. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Redundancy | The extracted judgment text says only that 'the claim' was struck out. This claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing for the case and is not separately analysed in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The extracted judgment text says only that 'the claim' was struck out. This claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing for the case and is not separately analysed in the judgment text. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text says only that 'the claim' was struck out. This claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing for the case and is not separately analysed in the judgment text. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.