Case 3203835/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Prince Raju v Applemed Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3203835/2022
- Decision date
- 6 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Isaacson Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Prince Raju
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that Mr Prince Raju was unfairly dismissed because the reason for dismissal was redundancy but no fair procedure was followed. It found that he had been able to find alternative work at a similar rate of pay, so no compensatory award was made. The Tribunal recorded that the claimant was awarded a redundancy payment equivalent to the basic award.
The redundancy payment succeeded in the sum of £1,050.53. The Tribunal calculated that figure from a gross monthly salary of £2,276.15, giving an annual salary of £27,313.80 and a weekly figure of £525.27, multiplied by 2. It noted that the claimant was 37 and had 2 years' completed service.
The claim for unlawful deduction from wages also succeeded. The Tribunal declared that the respondent had unlawfully deducted the gross sum of £2,276.15 from December 2021 salary, £678.93 from the December bonus, and £840.42 in respect of 8 days' holiday entitlement due on termination. It ordered the respondent to pay tax and NIC to HMRC and to pay the claimant £1,853.05 net for the salary, approximately £509.20 net for the bonus, and approximately £630.32 net for the holiday pay. The total gross sum ordered to be paid was £4,846.03.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found the dismissal was for redundancy but no fair procedure was followed. It said the claimant found alternative work at a similar rate of pay, so no compensatory award was made; the award corresponded to the basic award/reduncancy payment figure. | Upheld | — | £1,051 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment calculated from a gross monthly salary of £2,276.15, an annual salary of £27,313.80, and a weekly figure of £525.27, multiplied by 2. The Tribunal noted the claimant was 37 and had 2 years' completed service. | Upheld | — | £1,051 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal declared unlawful deductions for December 2021 salary (£2,276.15 gross), December bonus (£678.93 gross), and 8 days' holiday entitlement on termination (£840.42 gross). It ordered tax and NIC to HMRC and payment to the claimant of £1,853.05 net for salary, approximately £509.20 net for the bonus, and approximately £630.32 net for holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,846
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,051
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.