Case 3203847/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Leslie v EPP Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3203847/2022
- Decision date
- 15 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Leslie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 July 2022, the tribunal gave Mr L Leslie an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the unfair dismissal claim had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant had insufficient service, that the claimant had not replied to the tribunal’s 28 July 2022 letter, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Leslie did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Gardiner Date struck out the claim on 15 September 2022. The judgment records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claim after giving the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 28 July 2022 to make representations or request a hearing. The reasons stated that the unfair dismissal claim had no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant had insufficient service, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.