Case 3203912/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Anika Mannan v The Mentoring Lab Community CIC — 2022
- Case reference
- 3203912/2022
- Decision date
- 25 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hook Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Anika Mannan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 25 October 2022 before Employment Judge Hook, the tribunal recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim remained struck out under the order of Employment Judge Byrne dated 6 October 2022. That claim was therefore not determined on its merits at this hearing.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's claim for notice pay was not well founded and dismissed it. No further reasons were set out in the extracted judgment text.
The claimant's holiday claim was found well founded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £370 in respect of that claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant's unfair dismissal claim remained struck out as per the order of Employment Judge Byrne on 6 October 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's claim for notice pay was found not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's claim for holiday was found well founded, and the respondent was ordered to pay £370. | Upheld | — | £370 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £370
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.