Case 3203922/2021 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Sandeep Matolia (2) Harsha Vardhan Tammineni v SAI Engineering Services Pvt Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3203922/2021
- Decision date
- 10 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Feeny Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Sandeep Matolia (2) Harsha Vardhan Tammineni
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 26-27 May 2022 before Employment Judge Feeny sitting alone. The claims were brought by Sandeep Matolia and Harsha Vardhan Tammineni against SAI Engineering Services Pvt Ltd. The judgment records two monetary claims only, with no discrimination or dismissal issues addressed in the decision text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The First Claimant's claim was for unpaid wages as a breach of contract. The tribunal ordered payment of £16,973 gross of deductions. | Upheld | — | £16,973 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Second Claimant's claim was for an unlawful deduction of wages from salary. The tribunal ordered payment of £23,230 gross of deductions. | Upheld | — | £23,230 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £40,203
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.