Case 3203936/2022 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Miss A M Kilbane (2) Mr K Witek v Lord 12 Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3203936/2022
- Decision date
- 21 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Frazer Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Miss A M Kilbane (2) Mr K Witek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response and did not attend the hearing on 21 November 2022. Employment Judge A Frazer therefore upheld the claims under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records an award of £3,166.66 to each claimant. Annex A states that each award consisted of £2,916.66 for notice pay and £250 for consequential expenses. The total judgment was £6,333.32.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Miss A M Kilbane: awarded £3,166.66, comprising £2,916.66 notice pay and £250 consequential expenses. | Upheld | — | £3,167 |
| Breach of contract | Mr K Witek: awarded £3,166.66, comprising £2,916.66 notice pay and £250 consequential expenses. | Upheld | — | £3,167 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,333
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.