Case 3203958/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Pennant v London Borough of Newham — 2022
- Case reference
- 3203958/2022
- Decision date
- 3 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Pennant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the East London Employment Tribunals on 21 July 2022. The respondent was not defending the claim, and Employment Judge Burgher gave judgment under Rule 21.
The tribunal held that the claims for unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction of wages, and unpaid notice succeed. No remedy figure was determined in this judgment; the listed hearing on 7 December 2022 was converted to a remedy hearing, with directions for a schedule of loss and witness statement exchange.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the respondent was not defending the claim and that the claim for unfair dismissal succeeds under Rule 21. Remedy was left to a remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the claim for unlawful deduction of wages succeeds. Remedy was left to a remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states the claim for unpaid notice succeeds. This has been classified as wrongful dismissal because it concerns notice pay; no separate monetary remedy was determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.