Case 3203976/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Shields v Quadient Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3203976/2021
- Decision date
- 24 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Brien Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Shields
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs D Shields brought claims against Quadient Ltd including unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and complaints under the Equality Act 2010. On the preliminary issue heard by Employment Judge O’Brien on 24 March 2022, the tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint was presented outside the statutory time limit in s111(2)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and refused to extend time under s111(2)(b). That complaint was dismissed.
The tribunal also held that the breach of contract claim for damages was submitted outside the time limit in article 7(a) of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 and refused to extend time under article 7(c). That claim was dismissed.
As to the Equality Act 2010 complaints, the tribunal found they were submitted outside the time limit in s123(1)(a), but extended time under s123(1)(b) for the most recent allegations pleaded in paragraphs 38, 39, 45 and 46 of the Rider to ET1 and any others with which they constituted an act extending over a period. The tribunal said it was arguable that all of the Equality Act complaints were so related and therefore refused to dismiss any of them at that stage, without prejudice to any final hearing decision on limitation.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the complaint was presented outside the time limit in s111(2)(a) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and refused to extend time under s111(2)(b). | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim for damages for breach of contract was found to be outside the time limit in article 7(a) of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 and time was not extended under article 7(c). | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The Equality Act 2010 complaints were out of time under s123(1)(a), but time was extended under s123(1)(b) for the most recent allegations pleaded in paragraphs 38, 39, 45 and 46 of the Rider to ET1 and any others constituting an act extending over a period. The tribunal refused to dismiss those complaints at the preliminary stage, without prejudice to the final hearing. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s111(2)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s111(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- article 7(a) Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- article 7(c) Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- s123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010
- s123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.