Case 3204001/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Susak v Proctor & Gamble Product Supply (UK) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3204001/2022
- Decision date
- 13 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Susak
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 13 October 2023 before Employment Judge Gardiner. The claimant, Mr R Susak, did not attend. The respondent, Proctor & Gamble Product Supply (UK) Limited, was represented by Mr Christopher Howells, counsel.
The tribunal stated that the claimant’s claim was dismissed for non-attendance in accordance with Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the claim.
No remedy was awarded and no separate compensation figures were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the claim for non-attendance under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013. The judgment does not record a substantive liability finding. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.