Case 3204040/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Christian v United Facilities Support Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3204040/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Christian
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case, heard by Employment Judge Byrne by telephone at East London Hearing Centre on 8 December 2022, concerned Mr W Christian's claims against United Facilities Support Services Limited. The tribunal amended the respondent's name to United Facilities Support Services Limited at the outset.
The tribunal held that the claimant's breach of contract claim and his claim for unauthorised deductions from wages were not well-founded and dismissed both claims. The respondent's counterclaim for breach of contract was also found not well-founded and dismissed. No monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claimant's breach of contract claim was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Respondent's counterclaim for breach of contract was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.