Case 3204047/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Doig v Syco Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3204047/2022
- Decision date
- 18 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Allen Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Doig
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Doig brought a claim against Syco Ltd. At the hearing before Employment Judge F Allen on 17 January 2023, the tribunal decided that the respondent had been in breach of contract by dismissing the claimant without notice.
The remedy recorded in the judgment was the agreed net sum of £1,500 for that breach. The tribunal also stated that the respondent was liable for any tax and/or national insurance contributions due on that agreed net amount.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract by dismissing the claimant without notice. It ordered payment of the agreed net amount of £1,500 and recorded that the respondent was liable for any tax and/or national insurance contributions due on that amount. | Upheld | — | £1,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.