Case 3204155/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Lyons v Abee Asbestos Removal Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3204155/2022
- Decision date
- 13 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Yale
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Lyons
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Yale determined the claim on the papers. The tribunal found that Ms S Lyons had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered Abee Asbestos Removal Ltd to pay damages of £2,215.80.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,323.70. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £886.52.
The hearing listed for 11 January 2023 was cancelled. No panel members are listed in the judgment and no separate legal test is identified in the text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded in respect of notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,216 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £3,324 |
| Holiday pay | Award for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £887 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,426
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.