Case 3204174/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Y Barton v Fairclean Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3204174/2022
- Decision date
- 10 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reid Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Y Barton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms Y Barton, brought a victimisation claim under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 against Fairclean Limited. The hearing took place at East London Hearing Centre on 7 October 2022 before Employment Judge Reid.
The tribunal dismissed the victimisation claim. Its reason was that Ms Barton accepted she had not raised a claim falling within section 27(2) Equality Act 2010. The tribunal recorded that what she had raised was a personal injury claim about her accident at work, rather than a discrimination claim.
No remedy was awarded because the only claim in the judgment was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The tribunal dismissed the claim under s27 Equality Act 2010 because the claimant accepted she had not raised a discrimination claim within s27(2), but instead had raised a personal injury claim about her accident at work. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s27 Equality Act 2010
- s27(2) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.