Case 3204236/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Kemp v First Distribution Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3204236/2022
- Decision date
- 24 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Klimov
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Kemp
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Kemp’s claim against First Distribution Limited was heard on 24 April 2023 by Employment Judge P Klimov sitting alone. The tribunal recorded that the respondent was in breach of contract in five respects: failing to pay salary of £184.87, accrued but untaken holiday pay of £82.19, employer pension contributions of £475.20, business expenses of £120.86, and sales commission of £883.23.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,746.35 in total, described as damages for breach of contract. No separate findings, statutory claims, or additional remedy components are set out in the extracted text beyond the itemised contractual sums and the total award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay salary (£184.87), accrued but untaken holiday (£82.19), employer pension contributions (£475.20), business expenses (£120.86), and sales commission (£883.23). It ordered payment of the total sum of £1,746.35 as damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £1,746 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,746
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.