Case 3204304/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Kremer v Tuffbau Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3204304/2022
- Decision date
- 10 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reid Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Kremer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 10 January 2023 at East London Hearing Centre by Employment Judge Reid via CVP. The claimant, Mr J Kremer, did not attend. His representative came off the record on 4 January 2023, and the tribunal noted there had been no contact from the claimant since an email of 8 November 2022 requesting more time to comply with tribunal orders.
The tribunal recorded that an extension of time had been granted, but the claimant did not then comply with the outstanding orders, which included disclosure, witness statement and schedule of loss. His representative had said there were difficulties in communication because he was abroad and had been unwell, but no evidence of ill health or other attendance problems was provided. The tribunal also tried the mobile number given on the ET1; a person called Simon answered and said he had never heard of the claimant.
Applying Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013, and having considered the information before it and the need to avoid delay, save expense and deal proportionately with the issues, the tribunal decided it was not appropriate to proceed in the claimant's absence. It therefore struck out all of the claimant's claims in their entirety. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Struck out under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the 10 January 2023 hearing and had not complied with tribunal orders; the judgment does not set out a separate determination on the merits of this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | Struck out under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the 10 January 2023 hearing and had not complied with tribunal orders; the judgment does not set out a separate determination on the merits of this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the 10 January 2023 hearing and had not complied with tribunal orders; the judgment does not set out a separate determination on the merits of this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the 10 January 2023 hearing and had not complied with tribunal orders; the judgment does not set out a separate determination on the merits of this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- Rule 2 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.