Case 3204544/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Gott v Allcover Insurance Brokers Ltd t/a LDS Associates — 2023
- Case reference
- 3204544/2022
- Decision date
- 13 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Gott
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs M Gott brought a claim against Allcover Insurance Brokers Ltd t/a LDS Associates. The case was heard on 13 March 2023 before Employment Judge D Brannan sitting alone at East London Hearing Centre by Cloud Video Platform, with the claimant representing herself and Miss Cashell of Counsel for the respondent.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of the claim. It held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claimant’s claim pursuant to section 111(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed without any substantive finding on the underlying dismissal issue.
No monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the claim pursuant to section 111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 111(2) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.