Case 3204562/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Slawomir Lazdzin v Messiah Corporation Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3204562/2021
- Decision date
- 8 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Housego Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Slawomir Lazdzin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal first considered limitation and found the claim was in time. Mr Lazdzin was dismissed on 5 February 2021, the three-month period expired on 4 May 2021, and the tribunal added 23 days for early conciliation between 15 February and 8 March 2021. On that calculation, the ET1 presented on 27 May 2021 was within time.
The respondent did not attend the telephone hearing, was not represented, and sent no submissions. The tribunal noted that it had been notified of the hearing. It struck out the response under rule 47 because of non-attendance, and also under rule 37(1)(a), (c) and (d), finding no reasonable prospect of success, non-compliance with an order for further and better particulars, and that the response had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal also considered the substance of the grounds of resistance, which consisted of numbered statements headed "Facts" and allegations said to be from different people. It recorded that those documents did not deal with the merits of the claim, other than asserting that summary dismissal was appropriate. The tribunal accepted the claimant's schedule of loss as accurate and entered judgment for £1,978.60 unlawful deductions from wages, £453.91 holiday pay, and £810.55 notice pay, making a total award of £3,243.06.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £1,978.60 for unlawful deductions from wages. The schedule of loss broke this down as unpaid wages and a daily living allowance element. | Upheld | — | £1,979 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £453.91 as outstanding holiday pay under reg 14 WTR 1998. | Upheld | — | £454 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered payment of £810.55 notice pay. The schedule of loss described this head as wrongful dismissal/breach of contract and relied on s.86(1)(a) ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £811 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,243
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- rule 47: Non-attendance
- rule 37(1)(a)
- rule 37(1)(c)
- rule 37(1)(d)
- s.86(1)(a) ERA 1996
- reg 14 WTR 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.