Case 3204579/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Waseem Yousaf v Iceland Foods Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3204579/2021
- Decision date
- 16 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Knight Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms Tracey Jansen, Mr Steven Woodhouse
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Waseem Yousaf
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the parties had agreed terms. Following a withdrawal by the Claimant, the claims were dismissed.
No findings on the merits of the public interest disclosure, unfair dismissal, or unlawful deduction from wages claims are recorded. No remedy or settlement figures are set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms and that the claims were dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant; it does not set out separate reasons or terms for this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms and that the claims were dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant; it does not set out separate reasons or terms for this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms and that the claims were dismissed following withdrawal by the Claimant; it does not set out separate reasons or terms for this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.