Case 3204585/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Lee-Ann Adendorff v Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3204585/2022
- Decision date
- 27 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mack Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss Lee-Ann Adendorff
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant brought claims against the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and Design and Manage Limited, which was in liquidation. The hearing took place at the East London Hearing Centre on 27 January 2023 before Employment Judge Mack.
The tribunal recorded that the Claimant's claims under sections 170 and 188 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 failed and were dismissed. The judgment does not set out further factual findings, reasoning, or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the Claimant's claim under section 170 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 failed and was dismissed; it does not specify the underlying payment category. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the Claimant's claim under section 188 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- sections 170 and 188 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.