Case 3204593/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Al-Salem v P Slice Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3204593/2022
- Decision date
- 10 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Al-Salem
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The respondent, P Slice Ltd, attended by Mr Qureshi but had not entered a Response. Employment Judge C Lewis therefore recorded judgment on the claimant's monetary claims on 10 November 2022, following the hearing on 8 November 2022 by telephone at East London Hearing Centre.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered it to pay the gross sum of £4,398.73. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £745.57.
The judgment states that the amounts were calculated on a gross basis and that the respondent was entitled to make any deductions due for tax and national insurance contributions before payment was made. No separate liability reasoning, legal test, or additional remedy was recorded in the extracted text beyond those orders.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and orders payment of the gross sum of £4,398.73. | Upheld | — | £4,399 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders payment of £745.57. | Upheld | — | £746 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,144
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.