Case 3204594/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Stabrawa Ms E Stabrawa v K E Kents Holdings Limited and 3 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 3204594/2021
- Decision date
- 23 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Elgot Representation
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr M Stabrawa Ms E Stabrawa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on 17 March 2022 before Employment Judge B Elgot, sitting remotely by CVP. The judge heard evidence from Mr D J Nolan and Mr K E Kent, together with written and oral submissions from both sides. No substantive liability findings were made at this hearing.
The tribunal held that the correct employer of both claimants is the second respondent, K E Kents Limited. It ordered that the first respondent, K E Kents Holdings Limited, remains a party to the proceedings. The judgment also records that no default judgment had been issued or promulgated in any of the eight cases, despite references to one in correspondence.
The respondents were permitted to amend their grounds of resistance in case 3204598/21 by withdrawing an admission and substituting wording under the heading "Unpaid Wages". The judge stated that the question of the Second Claimant's employment would be decided at the final hearing. Time for presenting the responses was extended to 24 March 2022, and the amended grounds of resistance were accepted out of time as disclosing a robust and properly particularised defence that was not without reasonable prospect of success.
The claimants were also permitted to add a claim that neither had been given written particulars of their terms and conditions of employment as required by sections 1-4 Employment Rights Act 1996. The final hearing was listed for 24, 25, 26 and 27 October 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing order only: the tribunal permitted the claimants to add a claim under sections 1-4 Employment Rights Act 1996, but did not determine the merits of that claim at this hearing. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 20 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- sections 1-4 Employment Rights Act 1996
- not without reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.