Case 3204653/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Perkins v Morgarten Restaurants Lakeside Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3204653/2022
- Decision date
- 16 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Perkins
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim on 10 November 2022 in the respondent’s absence. It noted that no Response had been filed in time, that the respondent had notice of the hearing, and that it did not attend or contact the tribunal. The tribunal also substituted Morgarten Restaurants Lakeside Limited for Bourgee Limited after the claimant checked a payslip and confirmed the correct employer.
The claimant had worked as a chef from 27 December 2021 to 15 May 2022 on a monthly salary of £2,250 before tax. He gave evidence that he was absent from work due to sickness from 7 May 2022, asked the general manager Chris how much notice he needed to give, was told one week, and then gave the one week’s notice required under his contract. The tribunal accepted that evidence and found the claim for one week’s notice pay succeeded.
On holiday pay, the claimant said he had not taken any holiday during his employment. The tribunal accepted that he had attended race meetings, but found these were on his scheduled days off on his usual rota and not taken as holiday. It therefore found that, pro rata, he had accrued 11.5 days’ holiday entitlement at termination and awarded £1,194.28 for holiday pay.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £519.23 for notice pay and £1,194.28 for holiday pay, making a total award of £1,713.51. No separate award components beyond those sums were identified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | One week’s notice pay awarded after the tribunal accepted the claimant had given the one week notice required under his contract. | Upheld | — | £519 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the claimant had not taken holiday during employment and was entitled to 11.5 days’ pro rata holiday pay at £103.85 gross per day. | Upheld | — | £1,194 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,714
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.