Case 3204800/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Andrew Jones v NSN Traders Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3204800/2021
- Decision date
- 18 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Travers Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Andrew Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAndrew Jones’s claim against NSN Traders Limited was heard remotely at East London Hearing Centre on 10 and 11 November 2022 before Employment Judge Travers. The judgment dated 18 November 2022 records that the claim was dismissed.
The extracted judgment text does not set out separate factual findings or reasons for each pleaded head of claim, and it does not record any award of compensation or other remedy. Oral reasons were given at the end of the hearing, but they are not included in the extracted text supplied here.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records only that the claim is dismissed and does not give separate findings for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records only that the claim is dismissed and does not give separate findings for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only that the claim is dismissed and does not give separate findings for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records only that the claim is dismissed and does not give separate findings for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.