Case 3204802/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Zeta Watson v Caterlink Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3204802/2021
- Decision date
- 24 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Travers Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Zeta Watson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Zeta Watson succeeded in her claim that Caterlink Limited had made an unlawful deduction from her wages. Employment Judge Travers ordered the respondent to pay £363 gross, and stated that this sum related to pay for the period from 21 December 2020 until 4 January 2021.
The tribunal rejected the claimant’s case that she was entitled to sick pay for the period after 4 January 2021. The judgment also states that, as set out in paragraph 2 of the notice of reconsideration dated 21 June 2022, all other aspects of the claim for arrears of pay were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of £363 gross for the period 21 December 2020 to 4 January 2021. The claimant’s request for sick pay after 4 January 2021 was rejected, and all other aspects of the arrears claim were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £363 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £363
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.