Case 3204823/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Seeney v Arcus FM Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3204823/2021
- Decision date
- 6 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Seeney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr R Seeney's claim against Arcus FM Ltd. The judgment records that, by a letter dated 20 August 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim type or any remedy. It states that the hearing fixed for 23 September 2022 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the judgment text does not identify the claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.