Case 3204920/2021 · Employment Tribunal
1. Mr Ashraf Ali 2. Mr Md Anisuzzaman v Sweet Hall Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3204920/2021
- Decision date
- 17 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Brien
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1. Mr Ashraf Ali 2. Mr Md Anisuzzaman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants, Mr Ashraf Ali and Mr Md Anisuzzaman, brought claims for breach of contract including wrongful dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, and payment in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday pay. The respondent did not respond to the claims. The tribunal consolidated the claims and listed them for a telephone hearing on 17 December 2021 before Employment Judge O’Brien sitting alone.
No-one attended the hearing. The clerk attempted to contact the parties, but neither the respondent nor the claimants’ representative joined the call. The judge was satisfied that the claimants’ representative had been served with notice of the hearing and noted that no explanation was given for the absence of either side. In those circumstances, the tribunal decided it was in the interests of justice to proceed in the absence of both parties.
The tribunal recorded that in each head of claim the claimants bore the burden of proving the loss claimed. Because no evidence was provided and the claimants did not attend to confirm the matters alleged in their claim forms, the tribunal found that the complaints had not been made out. All claims were therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal described this as a claim for damages for breach of contract including wrongful dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal described this as complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal described this as claims for payment in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.